Categories
Aging Living

The Manufacture of Emergency

The screens at Visa never went dark. Somewhere in a data center, transactions were clearing at a rate that made the number itself feel abstract, and our job was to sit inside that river and notice the one drop moving wrong. A fraud ring testing stolen numbers in ascending increments. A merchant category code that didn’t match the geography. A velocity spike that looked, if you squinted, like nothing at all, until it didn’t. The work had a shape to it: quiet, then a pattern surfaces, then the chase, then the catch or the near-miss, then quiet again. I didn’t think of it as drama at the time. I thought of it as Tuesday.

It took me a long time to notice that the shape of that work was also the shape of something in me, and that I’d built a career, without quite meaning to, out of environments that manufactured the same cycle over and over. Fraud detection was one. A Piper Cherokee is another โ€” not because flying is reckless, it isn’t, competent flying is the opposite of reckless, but because every cross-country trip contains a small structured emergency built into the planning itself: the weather that might close in, the fuel math that has to work, the decision point where you commit or you divert. You solve it. You land. The relief is real and it is, if you’re honest with yourself, part of what you came for.

Retirement removes all of that. Nobody hands you a fraud queue. There is no fuel gauge counting down over Ohio. What retirement hands you instead is something much harder to sit inside: an undifferentiated stretch of days with no built-in shape, no crisis with a clock on it, no adversary to defeat by five o’clock. I did not expect this to be difficult. I had spent decades, if you’d asked me, wanting exactly this โ€” quiet, unstructured time, the absence of alarms. And for the first while it was wonderful. Then I noticed I had opened a second screen.

The options positions started small and reasonable, the way these things do. A covered call here, a defined-risk spread there, sized so that nothing could actually hurt. But I noticed the pull on days when nothing needed attention. I’d be three-quarters through a walk around the pond, the morning doing exactly what a morning is supposed to do, and I’d feel for my phone anyway, not because a position needed managing but because the quiet had started to feel like something unresolved. I would open the app looking, if I am being precise about it, less for information than for a small manufactured stake โ€” something with a clock on it, something I could watch move against me and then, with luck, defeat.

This is not a confession about trading, which when done with defined risk and a plan is just a hobby with numbers attached. It’s an admission about what I was actually shopping for on those walks, which was the old shape. Tension, then resolution. Fear, then relief. The problem with the shape is that it doesn’t ask whether the underlying situation warrants it. It just asks to be fed. A market that is genuinely quiet gets treated the same as a fraud queue with a live threat in it, because the appetite doesn’t distinguish between real stakes and stakes you went looking for. You can tell yourself you’re staying sharp. Sometimes you’re just bored, and bored, for a person built the way I apparently am, does not feel like rest. It feels like a low hum of unfinished business, and unfinished business is a thing I have spent a working lifetime being paid to resolve.

I don’t think this gets solved so much as it gets noticed, and noticing changes the ratio a little. The phone is always in my pocket; that isn’t the part I can negotiate with. What I’ve started doing instead is naming the moment my hand goes for it on a walk that doesn’t need interrupting โ€” catching the reach itself, mid-motion, and asking what exactly I’m expecting to find. Most mornings I still open the app. But I open it now as someone watching himself do it, which is a smaller thing than stopping, and also, it turns out, not nothing.

Categories
Living Memories

The Depth of the Dimes

The lifeguard came out with a canvas bag, and that was the signal. Saturday morning, Kettering, Ohio, the municipal pool not yet warmed by the day, and forty kids arranging themselves along the edge like something had been rehearsed, though nobody had rehearsed it. We knew the shape of the thing without being told. He would walk to about the middle of the deck, and he would start throwing coins into the water.

Not pennies, mostly. I remember that distinctly, the way you remember the specifics of a thing you can’t explain the pull of. Nickels and dimes, a scattering of quarters, no half dollars that I ever saw hit the surface. Somebody in the recreation department had made a decision about denominations, a budget, maybe, or a sense of what a Saturday morning was worth to forty kids in Ohio in the summer, and none of us thought about that then. We watched the coins fall instead. That’s the part I keep returning to โ€” not the diving, the falling. Coins don’t drop through water the way they drop through air. They wobble. They catch light and lose it. They take their time getting to the bottom, and you’d track one the way you’d track a hawk, losing it, finding it again against the pool floor, memorizing the spot before it disappeared into the general scatter of everything else he’d thrown.

We tried to angle ourselves near the shallow end, obviously. That was the whole strategy, such as it was โ€” get positioned somewhere you could stand, somewhere your ears wouldn’t need to fight the pressure, somewhere the breath-holding would be a formality instead of a genuine risk. But the lifeguard wasn’t interested in making it easy. He’d throw a few coins shallow, just enough to keep the little kids occupied, and then he’d load up the deep end, and that’s where the real money went down. If you wanted more than a couple of nickels, you had to go where you couldn’t stand.

Then the countdown, and then all of us at once, forty kids hitting the water in the same three seconds, which meant the water itself turned against you before you’d even started looking โ€” churned, clouded, chlorine stinging worse than usual because now there were elbows in it, knees, someone’s foot near your face. I wasn’t especially good at it. I want to say that plainly, because I don’t think I was; I’d come up with a handful, four or five coins, sometimes a quarter if I’d gotten lucky with the angle, and that felt like enough. Enough to matter. Enough to walk back to the locker room afterward with my trunks pocket sagging and clinking, enough to spend the rest of the morning transferring nickels and dimes into my actual pants pocket like a kid who’d earned something.

There was a boy down the street whose father worked at NCR, and some Saturdays he’d disappear to Old River instead โ€” a real pool, he made sure we knew, an enormous one, with none of this scrounging-for-change business. I remember being aware of that difference without being able to name what it meant. He had the better pool. We had the lifeguard with the canvas bag.

I came across a piece online the other day, something about swimming and what it might mean, the kind of essay that circles a simple physical act until it turns into a meditation on something larger, and it knocked this memory loose after forty years of sitting untouched. I don’t know why that particular Saturday ritual is the one that stayed. Not the swimming lessons, not the diving board, not anything a person would call a memory on purpose. Just the coins going down, and all of us watching them go, already planning where we’d be standing when the countdown ended.

Categories
Living Walking

The Heron at Sharon Park

The heron did not fly.

Herons stand in water every morning of the world. Most don’t fly when a man walks past on a gravel path. But this one was close โ€” close enough to see the yellow ring around its eye like a struck coin, the black cap combed back into two sharp feathers, a heron dressed for church. It considered me, or the water, or nothing at all, holding a stillness that costs a heron nothing and would cost me everything.

Sharon Park keeps a rotating cast of herons the way other places keep pigeons โ€” gray, ill-tempered looking, small monks set down among the ducks. Usually they see me first and go up off the water in that ungainly unfolding, all elbows, and I’m left with the consolation of having glimpsed something before it left. This one let me stay. Let me get close enough to think the word friendly, though I know better โ€” what I was seeing was a fish, or the absence of one, some interior calculus that had nothing to do with me. I was not a guest. I was weather.

It stood on one leg in green water, a green wall of reflected trees behind it, the low light turning that whole ceiling of water the color of a bottle. Its double stood beneath it, upside down, exact, patient as the original. Two herons for the price of one โ€” one of feather, one of light, and I couldn’t have told you which was more real. The one in the water bent its neck into a shape the standing bird hadn’t made yet. It knew something the standing bird didn’t know, or had already forgotten.

Bubbles rose between them, a seam breaking the skin of the pond in a line, as though something down there were breathing, or as though the pond had decided, just this once, to show its work. Gas, probably, some decaying business at the bottom. But it looked like punctuation โ€” the pond trying to say something and getting only as far as a string of commas before losing the thought.

I stood there longer than the moment required. This is what a heron does, if it lets you close and doesn’t leave: it makes you overstay. I thought about how little the bird was doing and how much I was doing to it โ€” assigning it moods, welcoming it into my morning, when the truth was likely that it was simply waiting, the way I wait for coffee to cool, without company, without me. And yet it let me stay. Whatever arithmetic decided that, I was on the right side of it, for once, on an ordinary morning, my shoes going damp at the toe from standing too close to the edge.

Eventually I walked on, the way the heron surely expected I would, since staying is not a thing men do at ponds. I looked back once. It hadn’t moved. Its reflection hadn’t moved. The bubbles were still rising in their careful, aimless line โ€” saying nothing, saying everything, the pond continuing to be a pond after I’d stopped watching it be one.

Categories
Food and Drink Living

The Toast

The bread came out dark, most days โ€” darker than it needed to be. I never said anything. She’s gone now, and the sandwich has become a kind of monument, and you don’t deface a monument.

It was Wonder Bread, always โ€” the wrapper with the balloons, bought on the same trip as the milk. My father’s favorite bread was Roman Meal, for his sandwiches with cold cuts, ham and bologna. Not with this one, though. The BLT got Wonder Bread. No special reason for it. Just the reason a family has for anything: once, and then always.

Kraft mayonnaise, from the jar. The same jar for everything else. Mom did not experiment. She had the regular things she made, and made them the same way every time.

Dad was picky about most food. This one he ate. I don’t know why. Maybe nothing beats bacon fat and tomato juice. Maybe it got in early, before he’d built his defenses, and stayed in by seniority.

No pickles in her BLTs. I didn’t miss them then. We use Claussen slices now, cut flat for this exact purpose, and good farmers’ market tomatoes when the season allows it.

Lunch, mostly. Rarely dinner.

Past a certain point, toast stops helping the tomato and starts blocking it. Hers had crossed that point, most days. I ate it anyway. Said nothing.

We make our own now, on sourdough, and it has never once tasted like hers. Not technique. You don’t get the sandwich back โ€” any more than the kitchen, or the summer, or a mother at the counter making lunch for a picky man and a son who never once told her.

Note: inspired by the article “The Secret to a Perfect BLT Isn’t What You Think” by J.J. Goode in the New York Times.

Categories
Business Games Living

A Good Life Is an Infinite Game Played Well

I keep coming back to the eight CEOs in William Thorndike’s The Outsiders.

On paper they were capital allocators of unusual discipline. Looked at another way, they were people who had figured out how to play a long game inside systems designed to reward short ones. They treated the company as something that should still be healthy decades later, not as a vehicle for the next announcement or the next victory lap. Per-share value compounded quietly over time mattered more than size, applause, or the quarterly scoreboard. They were willing to look wrong for years. And most of them had little interest in the theater of the charismatic chief executive. Their authority accumulated the slow way โ€” through decisions that held up after the noise moved on.

It is the same stance James Carse described in an infinite game: a game whose purpose is not to win but to keep the play going. You are never finished, only ahead or behind, and the position worth wanting is often the one that feels slightly behind โ€” the one that still demands invention.

Micky Malka, describing the founders he most wants to back, named a similar cluster of qualities: the energy of a scientist, the conviction of a missionary, the heart of a partner, the dreams of an athlete, the obsession of an owner. People built that way don’t need the room to agree they’re winning. The Outsiders ran on a quieter version of the same current โ€” their edge was steadiness more than brilliance, the nerve to ignore the wrong scoreboard for as long as it took.

A good life asks for the same thing. Not trophies lined up on a shelf, but the willingness to keep playing with attention โ€” to keep learning, to keep showing up without needing anyone in the room to say you’re ahead. Thatโ€™s lifelong learning.

Henry Singleton ran Teledyne for almost three decades and rarely bothered to explain any decision to Wall Street. He wasn’t playing to be believed. He was playing to still be at the table thirty plus years on.

Categories
Living

Why the Light Leaves Mornings First

I woke up at my usual time this morning and noticed the room was a little dimmer than it had been just a week or two earlier. The light felt more reluctant to arrive. It wasnโ€™t dramatic โ€” just enough to make me check the clock and wonder whether the days were already turning.

They were. And the change had begun earlier than I expected.

Here on the San Francisco Peninsula, the earliest sunrise of the year came around June 12. The summer solstice โ€” the official longest day โ€” arrived on June 21. Yet the latest sunset didnโ€™t occur until June 28. That gap means the mornings started shortening while the evenings were still lengthening. Nature didnโ€™t wait for the solstice to begin reclaiming the light on the side of the day I care about most.

As a lifelong morning person, Iโ€™ll admit this feels slightly unfair. I treasure those early hours when the light arrives gently and the day still feels open and possible. Learning that those hours began to shrink first, while the evening light held on a little longer, feels like a quiet trick played on people who love the dawn.

The total amount of daylight still reached its peak on the solstice itself, when the Sun stands highest in our sky. But sunrise and sunset donโ€™t move in perfect step with each other. Two subtle astronomical effects are responsible: the gradual shift in the Sunโ€™s declination and the Equation of Time โ€” the small irregularity in the Sunโ€™s apparent motion caused by Earthโ€™s tilted, elliptical orbit. Together they create this gentle asymmetry. The mornings give ground first.

By today, July 10, both ends of the day are shortening. Sunrise here is around 5:54 a.m. and sunset around 8:32 p.m., bringing us down to roughly fourteen hours and thirty-eight minutes of daylight and losing about a minute each day. The process, though, began weeks ago โ€” quietly, on the morning side.

Iโ€™ve been reflecting on how often change arrives this way: unevenly, and rarely all at once. One part of a season or a life begins to shift while another part still feels steady. Itโ€™s easy to grumble when the change touches something we love. But thereโ€™s also an invitation in noticing it โ€” to pay closer attention to these transitions, to savor what remains abundant, and to stay curious about the small asymmetries that shape our days.

This morning the light is arriving more quietly than it did just a few weeks ago. Later Iโ€™ll step outside earlier than usual, just to meet it while itโ€™s still generous. The day is already growing shorter on my preferred side, yet it remains long enough for a walk, for gratitude, and for whatever the remaining hours might bring.

Nature doesnโ€™t negotiate. It simply keeps showing up โ€” sometimes a little earlier, sometimes a little later than weโ€™d prefer. And perhaps that, too, is part of what weโ€™re meant to notice.

Categories
Aging Living San Francisco/California Street Photography

The Zone

I have been alive for nearly a third of the time this country has existed. It arrived the way facts do at a certain age, sideways, while I was thinking about something else, and it sat me down. Two hundred and fifty years, and my own decades take up a third of it โ€” whether I meant to claim that much room or not.

I used to think the road was where I went to escape the smallness of a life. Now the road doesn’t call the way it once did. Some of that is willingness. More of it, if I’m honest, is a body thatโ€™s less steady, a bladder with a mind of its own. The body files its objections. I used to override them. I no longer do โ€” not because I’ve grown wise, but because the overriding costs more than it used to and buys less.

But I want to tell you about what I got instead, most Fridays, for not quite a decade, because it isn’t nothing.

Doug came across on the ferry from Larkspur, and I’d meet him at the Ferry Building โ€” watching the boat come in, watching him pick his way down the gangway with his camera bag, before either of us had said a word or made a single decision about where to walk. Then we’d head out along the Embarcadero, sometimes up into the financial district, and for the first ten minutes my mind would do what minds do. It would analyze. It would compose. There, the light coming off that glass tower, wait for the man in the overcoat to cross into it, no โ€” too late, gone. Appraising and timing, the way I’d once weighed a stock, or a runway, or a route.

And then, without my choosing it, something released. There’s no threshold you feel yourself cross. But sometime after the tenth minute, the appraising stopped, and seeing took over. Not looking for. Not looking at. The street would stop being a set of problems to solve and become only itself: a longshoreman on a break outside a pier, a gull working the same patch of pavement three times, fog sliding under the Bay Bridge like it had somewhere to be. Doug, a few yards off, would go quiet the same way, and we’d shoot for an hour or two and then find each other again at the end of the block.

By then we’d have worked up an appetite for something other than pictures. Tadich Grill, if we could get in โ€” the linen and the old wood and the waiters who’d been there longer than some of our careers. We’d order something plain and good, and that’s when the talking would start. Not small talk. The real kind. Work, kids, the state of things, whatever had lodged itself in each of us that week. The seeing on the street and the talking over lunch were not two different activities. They were the same hour, extended. One was attention paid to the world. The other was attention paid to each other.

I have flown airplanes and driven through weather I shouldn’t have, and I loved both for the demand they made on me โ€” the total, narrowing attention that leaves no room for the self that worries. What I didn’t understand then was that a boat crossing from Larkspur, and a Friday, and an old friend across a table at Tadich, could ask the same thing of me, for free, without a single mile of my own driving.

Covid stopped it. Not gradually โ€” the way most rituals fade, through scheduling and distance and the slow drift of people’s lives โ€” but all at once, the way everything stopped that spring. The ferry didn’t run. The restaurants closed. We never quite picked it back up, not the way it was. I don’t think either of us decided to let it go. It just didn’t survive being interrupted.

A third of the country’s whole life, and it took me most of my own to learn what those Fridays were teaching me โ€” and then to lose them before I’d finished learning it. I still see the ferry pulling in. I still see Doug on the gangway with his camera bag, in no hurry, already half in the zone before his feet touch the dock.

Categories
Living New York City Serendipity

The Grammar of Looking Up

The apartment was across from Penn Station, which meant that for one stretch of months in the mid-1970s, the architecture of my days was decided by trains I never took. I walked east instead, every morning, toward the United Nations, where a man named Frank Smith ran a personal development course that IBM SRI had decided its young people should sit through. I don’t remember most of what Frank said in that room. I remember one thing he said about the street outside it.

He told us we should start looking up. Literally โ€” on our walks back and forth across midtown, Penn Station to the East Side and back, twice a day, rain or not. Not all the way, usually. Mostly it was a floor or three: the window line just above the awnings, the cornice on a building you’d never once registered had a second story, let alone a sixth. The full climb to the rooflines โ€” gargoyles, setbacks, terra cotta lions โ€” was the occasional reward. Almost no one looks up in New York, he said, not even a little. The city trains you out of it. Too much at eye level demands your attention โ€” the cabs, the steam, the man asking for change, the woman walking too slowly in front of you โ€” so everything above your own eyeline disappears by consensus, not just the tops. Habits can be replaced. Look up enough times, even just a floor or three, and you’ll see a different city than the one everyone else is seeing.

I tried it. Walking up past the Pierpont Morgan stretch, or wherever the route took me, chin lifted some small number of degrees, feeling slightly foolish. Most days that was the whole of it โ€” a window line, a row of air conditioners, a sign painted directly onto brick decades before anyone called that vintage. Every so often the chin would tip back further, and there’d be something up there worth the extra degrees. A gargoyle with its mouth open mid-roar, forty years before air conditioning made gargoyles decorative rather than necessary. But that was the rare find. The habit was the floor or three. Nobody else on the sidewalk was seeing any of it, because nobody else on the sidewalk was looking at all.

The chin came back down on its own a couple of times a week, somewhere around a street corner with a slice joint on it, because New York seems to put one on every corner whether you need it or not. You smelled it before you saw it โ€” that specific combination of tomato, oregano, and hot grease that has no name I’ve ever found. Looking up was Frank’s discipline.

The pizza smell required none. It just reached out and took your head by the chin and turned it level again, toward the window with the steam on the glass and the guy folding a slice in half before he handed it over.

It is a small thing Frank Smith said in a room near the UN fifty years ago, and I have carried it around since the way you carry around a key to a house you no longer own. I don’t know what happened to the course, or to IBM SRI’s faith in such courses, or to Frank himself. I know what happened to the habit. It outlived the year, outlived the apartment across from Penn Station, outlived several cities I’ve lived in since that didn’t have the same vertical drama to reward the looking. I still do it. I did it last week on a walk that had nothing to do with midtown at all, tilting my head back on a street in California to find whatever was up there worth finding, and catching myself mid-gesture, thinking: that’s Frank’s, that one, still running fifty years later on the program he installed.

Most of what we’re taught to notice, we’re taught by people who wanted something from us โ€” a sale, a vote, a grade. Frank wanted nothing, as far as I could tell, except that we see more of the city than we’d been seeing. It’s such a small ambition for a teacher to have. Look up. That’s the whole curriculum. And it’s the only thing from that course, the only thing from that whole strange year of being instructed in personal development by a man whose face I can no longer quite reconstruct, that I still do, unbidden, on every street I’ve walked since.

Categories
Aging AI Business Living

The Being Phase

There is a metric making the rounds in technology investing circles that is, on its face, about market share and revenue concentration. Alex Sacerdote of Whale Rock Capital calls it the New Rule of 40 for AI. The formula is simple: take the percentage of a companyโ€™s sales derived from AI, add its percentage market share in that AI category, and if the sum reaches 40, you have a winner. Celestica, a company most people have never heard of, scores extraordinarily well. It owns somewhere between half and sixty percent of the cloud Ethernet white-box switch market. NVIDIA doesnโ€™t need a formula. It simply is what it is.

Sacerdote designed the metric to cut through a specific kind of noise โ€” the companies claiming AI exposure they donโ€™t actually have, the giants whose AI revenue hovers at one or two percent of their base while their press releases suggest otherwise. The framework is a detector. It finds the companies that have stopped becoming AI infrastructure and started simply being it.

I found myself less interested in the companies than in that distinction.


I spent years at Visa watching a network that had long since crossed that threshold. By the time I arrived, Visa wasnโ€™t becoming the global payments infrastructure. It was the global payments infrastructure. The work was real โ€” fraud detection, modeling, the daily labor of keeping something enormous running โ€” but the existential question had been settled before I got there. The network existed. Merchants accepted it because cardholders carried it. Cardholders carried it because merchants accepted it. That loop had been closing for decades. We were custodians of a fait accompli.

Thereโ€™s a particular feeling to working inside something that has already won. Itโ€™s not complacency exactly. The problems are genuine and the stakes are high. But the uncertainty has a different quality โ€” itโ€™s operational uncertainty, not existential uncertainty. Youโ€™re not asking whether the thing will survive. Youโ€™re asking how to run it well.

I didnโ€™t have language for that distinction then. Sacerdoteโ€™s metric gives me some. The companies that score highest on his New Rule of 40 have resolved their existential question. Theyโ€™re not fighting for position. Theyโ€™re administering a position already held.


The question that has followed me out of that career, and out of several decades of watching technology cycles turn, is simpler and more personal than any investment framework.

When did I cross that line myself?


I have been writing at sjl.us since 2001. Thatโ€™s not a boast โ€” itโ€™s a data point. Twenty-five years of thinking out loud, of ideas arriving rather than being argued, of the specific memory as structural anchor. The blog is not becoming anything. It is what it is: a record of a mind moving through time, accumulated into something that has its own weight and shape.

The book on payments systems exists. The career at Visa exists. The photographs exist. The train journeys exist. The years in Dayton exist, and the years on the Peninsula, and the particular way the light falls on the California coast at Pescadero in the late afternoon โ€” when the fog is still offshore and the hills are improbably green and everything goes briefly, completely quiet, as if the world is deciding whether to continue.

These are not things I am building toward. They are things I am.

Sacerdote would say I have high market share in a specific category. The category is small โ€” one person, one particular configuration of experience and attention and accumulated knowing โ€” but the share is essentially total. There is no competitor for the position of having lived this particular life. The moat is absolute. The switching costs are infinite.

I used to find that thought melancholy. The narrowing as loss. The aperture closing on what remains.

Iโ€™m not sure I find it melancholy anymore.


The L-Curve, Sacerdote says, is a long flatline followed by a vertical explosion. The tinkering phase, then the moment of lift. He means it as a description of demand curves for technology infrastructure. But I recognize the shape from somewhere closer. The long middle of a life, building and becoming, and then the morning you wake up and realize the building is substantially done. What remains is the being.

Thatโ€™s not an ending. Itโ€™s a different kind of beginning.


Sacerdoteโ€™s metric will eventually stop working. All frameworks do. The AI infrastructure cycle will mature, the L-Curves will flatten, and some new measure will emerge to find the next thing that is just beginning to become what it will be. Thatโ€™s the nature of markets. The detector has to change as the signal changes.

But thereโ€™s a complication worth naming. Analysts at Citadel Securities published a note recently observing that even the most powerful technologies must pass through the prosaic discipline of cost curves, capacity constraints, and marginal returns. Token bills are arriving unexpectedly. Compute is scarce. The vision of AI as ubiquitous, frictionless, and immediate is colliding with physical reality. Their conclusion: asset prices will periodically be forced to reconcile ambition with physical constraint.

Thatโ€™s not a refutation of Sacerdote. Itโ€™s a reminder that feeling like youโ€™ve arrived and having actually arrived are different things. The being phase has to be load-tested. The position has to hold under pressure.

I think about the fiber optics Corning is laying into the massive data center clusters โ€” ultra-thin, bendable, carrying more light than anything that came before. The cable doesnโ€™t know itโ€™s infrastructure. It just carries what itโ€™s given, at the speed itโ€™s capable of, across whatever distance is required. It doesnโ€™t matter what the cable believes about itself. What matters is whether the light actually moves.

That seems right to me. You become what you are over a long time, largely without noticing. And then one day someone builds a metric that accidentally describes your life, and you recognize yourself in it, and you think: yes. Thatโ€™s the shape of it. High concentration. High share. A moat that deepened while you were looking elsewhere.

But the moat still has to hold.

The being phase, it turns out, is not the end of something. Itโ€™s the proof that something was built. And the daily question โ€” for companies, for infrastructure, for a person in his late seventies still writing, still paying attention โ€” is whether what was built is actually load-bearing.

You donโ€™t get to stop finding out.

Categories
Aging Living

Life Is Wide Open. And Then Itโ€™s a Pinhole.

The world is shrinking. Or so weโ€™ve come to appreciate. Jet travel has made it possible to get almost anywhere on the planet in less than a day. And yet.

As Iโ€™ve gotten older Iโ€™ve become increasingly reluctant to do the kinds of things I wouldnโ€™t have hesitated to do as a younger man. Travel. Driving in busy traffic. Walking the streets in a sketchy urban neighborhood. Nothing dramatic. Just the ordinary texture of a life lived outward, which turns out to require a kind of low-level willingness I donโ€™t always find in myself anymore.

Iโ€™ve been trying to understand this.


When I turned 60 I did something Iโ€™d never done before. I looked up my life expectancy on a CDC table. The number that came back was 22. I sat with that for a moment. Twenty-two years. I had been alive for 60 and I had 22 more in the actuarial average, which meant I was already three-quarters of the way home. Nobody had told me this was coming. Not the number exactly, but the feeling the number produced โ€” the sudden rearrangement of the geometry, the sense that the horizon had quietly moved while I wasnโ€™t watching.

Iโ€™ve been watching it since.


The metaphor I keep returning to is a camera lens. When youโ€™re young the aperture is wide open. You travel. You navigate. You walk into unfamiliar neighborhoods without thinking about it because the lens is just doing what lenses do โ€” starving for light, taking it all in, indiscriminate in the way that only the young can afford to be indiscriminate.

Then it starts to stop down.

Not all at once. There is no morning when you wake up and find the aperture closed. It happens gradually, a slow tightening over years, and you donโ€™t notice because youโ€™re still inside the frame, still moving through the world. Until one day you notice youโ€™re thinking about the trip before you book it. Weighing it. The weighing itself is new.

What I didnโ€™t expect is that the closing doesnโ€™t feel linear. It feels exponential. The rate accelerating in ways that keep outrunning my revised estimates. You recalibrate. Then you recalibrate again. The next recalibration comes sooner than the last.


A friend saw Paul Simon in concert last night. That sent me back to Kodachrome, one of his early hits, a young manโ€™s song about color and vividness and the wide-open lens of youth. Everything looks worse in black and white, he sang at 31. Something about that lyric now, from this side of the aperture, makes it more true than it probably was when he wrote it.

He just thought he was writing about being young.


As a young family with two kids we toured southern England staying at farmhouse B&Bโ€™s. One of those vacation memories that linger. We visited the Cotswolds. A place where the stone is the color of late afternoon even at nine in the morning. The thing that catches you there isnโ€™t the famous honey-colored villages but the little creeks running through them โ€” water moving in ways you didnโ€™t expect, off to the side of what you came to see.

I wonโ€™t go back. Not because Iโ€™ve decided not to. Simply because the aperture has moved and the Cotswolds is on the other side of it now. Still lit. Still there. The creeks still running through in their surprising way.

This is not tragedy.

It is just true.


A stopped-down lens has a property that took me a while to appreciate. The depth of field becomes enormous. Everything in the frame holds with equal sharpness โ€” the near thing and the far thing, the room youโ€™re sitting in and the long accumulated past the room contains. You lose the beautiful blur. You lose the selective mercy of a wide aperture that lets the background go soft and permits you to choose, by implication, what matters.

Now the background insists.

Nothing escapes attention. The specific quality of a morning. The thought that arrives before anything is being asked of you. The idea carried for years, worked through carefully, finally put into words.


Hermann Hesse understood something about this. The deepest lesson of Siddhartha isnโ€™t something the protagonist learns from a teacher. Itโ€™s something he has to live until he knows it. Wisdom of this kind cannot pass from one person to another. It has to be earned on the inside, in real time.

Which is another way of saying it cannot be taught at all.

I can describe the aperture. I can hand you the metaphor. But you will only know what I mean when you are standing inside it yourself.

I couldnโ€™t have written any of this at 60. Couldnโ€™t have written it at 70. The aperture had to close this far before whatever this is came into focus โ€” the particular clarity that arrives not despite the narrowing but because of it.

Nobody told me that was coming either.

Thatโ€™s what I wanted to say.