Categories
Living Retirement Sports Writing

The Architecture of a Wound

I have read a lot of Wright Thompson pieces over the years. Enough to notice that I finish them feeling slightly implicated โ€” like I have been shown something true about a person I thought I understood, and the showing has cost me something comfortable. Thatโ€™s not a common feeling after reading sportswriting. Thompsonโ€™s a different kind of sports writer.

His profile of Steve Kerr, published this week in ESPN, is a case study in how he does it.

Go read it now. Before you continue here. Go read it!


The opening line: โ€œSteve Kerr walked into the lobby of the Beverly Wilshire with a secret.โ€

Thompson doesnโ€™t start with biography or context or the Warriorsโ€™ season. He starts with dramatic irony โ€” we are placed inside a moment where the subject knows something we donโ€™t, where the gap between public persona and private reality is already established before weโ€™ve gotten through the first sentence. We know, even before we know what the secret is, that the real story will be about what lives underneath the official one.

The secret is retirement. Kerr had made up his mind โ€” 95% certainty โ€” that this would be his last season. He checked in at the Beverly Wilshire, gave his room number, 516, as โ€œJohnny Bench Joe Montana,โ€ and then leaned across the breakfast table and almost mouthed the words: โ€œI think itโ€™s over.โ€

That room number detail is worth pausing on. It isnโ€™t decoration. A man who has spent 40 years inside professional basketball has encoded legends into the passwords of his daily life โ€” Benchโ€™s number, Montanaโ€™s number, woven together as a mnemonic for a hotel room heโ€™ll forget in three days. Thompson drops it and moves on without comment. He never explains it. He doesnโ€™t have to. The detail does its work the way a good poem does: you carry it with you, and it means more the longer you hold it.

This is the loaded object, and Thompson deploys it everywhere. Late in the piece, the coaches bond over the same memory trick on the road โ€” Thompson tells Kerr heโ€™s in room 2225, โ€œEmmitt Smith Rocket Ismail.โ€ The repetition isnโ€™t accidental. Itโ€™s Thompson showing us what the 82-game season actually is: a long chain of hotel rooms and encoded legends, a man building temporary homes out of other peopleโ€™s greatness.

Thompson earns the loaded objects by earning the access. He spent the entire season alongside Kerr โ€” embedded, unhurried, a still presence at the edge of the frame. The piece has the texture of someone who was there for the small moments precisely because he wasnโ€™t hunting the big ones. Heโ€™s in the coachesโ€™ locker room after losses, cracking Peronis on the team bus through the quiet midnight of Atlanta, at Pizzeria Bianco in Phoenix, at the Golden Gate Deli while Kerr eats his usual Honey Baked sandwich and texts โ€œConflictedโ€ and then adds: โ€œWhatโ€™s Lulu think?โ€ โ€œShe sees both sides.โ€

That kind of detail โ€” the dog with two minds about retirement โ€” is available only to a reporter who has spent enough time with a subject that the subject has stopped performing. Thompson collects these moments. They are the material.

But access is scaffolding. The building is what Thompson does with it.

Midway through the piece, he lands the paragraph that reorients everything that came before it. On January 18, 1984, a gunman shot Malcolm Kerr โ€” Steveโ€™s father, president of the American University of Beirut โ€” in the head. A family friend reached Steve in his dorm room at 3 a.m. Steve asked if his father was okay. There was a long pause. โ€œYour father was a great man,โ€ the friend finally said.

Steve ran downstairs and pounded on his teammatesโ€™ doors. Then he went and sat on the curb. โ€œOn Speedway Boulevard,โ€ he says, still remembering the cold concrete and the empty street. Thompson gives us that street name. He tells us Steve started walking, and that he hasnโ€™t slowed down since.

Suddenly the retirement question isnโ€™t about basketball at all.

The sport is Thompsonโ€™s vehicle. His real subject is always the wound underneath โ€” what drives a person to keep competing, keep building teams, keep moving, and what it means when the movement finally starts to slow. The question running beneath the entire Kerr piece isnโ€™t โ€œWill he stay or go?โ€ Itโ€™s the question Malcolmโ€™s assassination put into his son at 18, still unanswered 42 years later: what do you do when the thing that protected you from the worst moment of your life stops being available?

Thompson makes this explicit in one passage near the end. Kerr describes his fear about retirement: the coaching job, he says, doesnโ€™t just feed his soul โ€” it helps him manage his chronic daily pain. The pain, weโ€™ve learned by then, is rooted in unresolved trauma. Kerr has spent a year journaling every morning about his fatherโ€™s death and then deleting what he wrote, following a therapy program based on the idea that emotional wounds express themselves as physical ones. The back pain that plagued him for 12 years โ€” the migraines, the spinal leak, the decade of searching for relief from Mayo to Duke to England for stem-cell therapy โ€” began the same year he took the Warriors job. Writing opens the lines of communication. Winning keeps them open. Retirement threatens to seal them again.

Thompson doesnโ€™t editorialize. He just lays this all out, piece by piece, until the architecture becomes visible.

Thereโ€™s a moment in Minneapolis, late in the piece, that sticks with me.

The NBA has postponed a game after a nurse named Alex Pretti has been killed by federal agents. Kerr gathers the team in a hotel ballroom. Later, working through what to say publicly, he does something Thompson says heโ€™s never heard him do before โ€” he invokes his father.

โ€œMy father was killed by extremists,โ€ Kerr says, rehearsing lines. โ€œI know how that story ends.โ€

Thompson can hear his voice catch between sentences. โ€œIโ€™m crying right now,โ€ Kerr says.

At the press conference, Kerr doesnโ€™t mention his father. He talks about the families who will never get their loved ones back. He didnโ€™t have to say more. And Thompson, who was there for all of it โ€” the hotel ballroom, the phone call, the media room โ€” doesnโ€™t have to explain the connection either. Heโ€™s done the work of showing us who Malcolm Kerr was, what his assassination meant, how Steve has carried it. The press conference lands with the full weight of everything weโ€™ve already been given.

This is Thompson at his best: information as infrastructure, detail as detonator.

The piece ends not with a contract signing or a press conference. It ends with a granddaughter.

On the same day Kerr commits to returning โ€” the decision made, the call to Steph placed, the band getting back together โ€” his sonโ€™s younger daughter, Charlotte, takes her first steps. Kerr watches her toddle around the room. He thinks about his son as a toddler. He looks at the photograph on the wall of Nick and his older daughter grinning in front of the Golden Gate Bridge. โ€œIt all felt intertwined,โ€ Thompson writes. โ€œBlood family, basketball family, family. A cocoon, like his old Arizona manager said.โ€

That word โ€” cocoon โ€” has appeared once before. Itโ€™s what the Arizona manager called the arena the night Steve played two days after his father was killed. The crowd forming a protective warmth around a boy who had just lost everything. The team as shelter.

42 years later, itโ€™s still what Steve Kerr is building and protecting. Thompson knew to plant the word the first time so it could bloom at the end.

Thatโ€™s the technique. Thatโ€™s what I mean when I say reading him costs something. In a wonderful way. He shows you that the things people build โ€” teams, careers, dynasties โ€” are sometimes just very elaborate answers to questions they were asked at 18 on a cold curb on Speedway Boulevard. And then he leaves you with a baby taking her first steps, and you feel the whole weight of it all at once.

Categories
Family Fathers Living Sports

The Flashlights He Left Behind

Thereโ€™s a Wright Thompson piece from 2007 that I keep returning to. It was filed during the Masters, and itโ€™s technically about golf the way the ocean is technically about water.

The setup is simple: Thompson is at Augusta National for work, credentialed sportswriter in the press tent, watching the ceremonial first shots and the azaleas and all of it. His father had dreamed of attending just once. His father is dead. The piece is what happens when Thompson walks the course trying to find him.

I donโ€™t know how to write about it without sounding like Iโ€™m describing a dream to someone who wasnโ€™t there. So let me start with the craft.


Thompson opens with chipped beef on toast. Heโ€™s on the clubhouse veranda, waiting for Arnold Palmer, and a stranger asks what he ordered. โ€œIt was my dadโ€™s favorite meal,โ€ Thompson explains. A silence falls. โ€œDid you ever bring him here?โ€ the stranger asks. โ€œNo,โ€ Thompson says, turning away.

Thatโ€™s the whole wound, opened in three lines of dialogue. No commentary. Just the weight of the unanswered invitation โ€” the trip that never happened โ€” sitting there in a plate of chipped beef. The best sportswriters understand that the specific detail does what abstraction never can. Thompson doesnโ€™t tell you he carries grief. He shows you where it lives.

Then comes the structural move that makes the piece something more than a personal essay. Thompson builds a rhythm โ€” three times, he lands the phrase that is Augusta โ€” each time widening the frame. Nicklaus on 18, glancing at his son, repeating his own fatherโ€™s last words. Tiger winning in 1997, finding Earl in the gallery, a sonโ€™s head on a fatherโ€™s shoulder. And then, quietly, devastating: This, too, is Augusta: me, needing a daddy more than ever.

By the time the narratorโ€™s grief enters the frame, the reader has already been prepared to receive it. The repetition is a kind of structural kindness. Thompson is telling you: pay attention, something is being built here. When it arrives, it doesnโ€™t feel sudden. It feels inevitable.


The piece has a spine you donโ€™t notice until youโ€™ve read it twice. Thompson asks the same question at two different moments: Daddy, are you out there?

The first time, heโ€™s standing in the rain, alone, by a sapling planted exactly one year after his fatherโ€™s death. Heโ€™d been standing guard over the tree in a downpour, soaked, because heโ€™d been unable to protect his father in life. No answer comes. Just the shattering windows of water falling from the sky.

The second time, heโ€™s in the bleachers at Amen Corner. He whispers it. And from somewhere across the course, a roar rises from the gallery, moving through the pines, fading back to silence.

Thompson is careful here. He writes: Understand that I donโ€™t believe in stuff like this and am certain it is a coincidence. That hedge is the whole story. The man who doesnโ€™t believe in signs is exactly the man who most needs to find one. The moment works precisely because he doesnโ€™t oversell it. He puts it down and lets it be what it is โ€” or what the reader needs it to be.


The passage I keep coming back to is near the end, not at the emotional peaks. Thompson has just watched Jim Gray, the television reporter, carefully lift the rope so his white-haired father can slip beneath it. A small thing. A son holding a rope. And Thompson realizes heโ€™s watching himself in reverse โ€” that the transition heโ€™s been grieving his way through is also a transition toward something.

The piece ends not with closure but with continuation. He buys a tiny green Masters onesie. A small knit golf shirt for a toddler. And the last line the sales clerk offers โ€” meant as a coo over the cute little clothes โ€” lands as the verdict Thompson has been seeking all week: Oh, good daddy.

Itโ€™s the right ending because it doesnโ€™t answer the grief. The hole in your chest after losing your daddy never gets filled, Thompson writes, and he means it. What the ending does instead is redirect the inheritance. Heโ€™s received everything he needed. He just needs to pass it on.


Thatโ€™s what the best longform sportswriting can do when itโ€™s working at full power. The Masters is the container. Inside it: a meditation on what fathers give us that we donโ€™t fully inventory until theyโ€™re gone, and what we owe the children we havenโ€™t had yet.

Thompson filed this piece for a newspaper. He was 30 years old. That this exists at all feels like its own small miracle โ€” a man sitting down in grief and producing something that will outlast the tournament, and probably him.

Go read it. The link is here. Then come back and sit with it for a while.

Categories
Living Sports Writing

When the Lights Come On

I was listening to a conversation with the writer Wright Thompson recently, and he struck a profound chord when talking about why he is so captivated by sports. He distilled the entirety of athletic competition down to a single, brilliant truth: it is all about who you are when “the lights come on.”

If you have ever stood in a massive arena or a darkened stadium just before the main event, you know exactly the feeling he means. The anticipation in the air isn’t just an emotion; it is a physical weight. You can feel the collective breath of thousands held in suspense. And then, with a sudden, sharp clack of the breakers, the big stadium lights hit. The room almost shakes with the sudden injection of energy. In that brilliant, unforgiving glare, every shadow vanishes. There is nowhere to hide.

We are taught from a young age to prepare, to practice, to build our skills in the quiet comfort of the shadows. We spend so much of our lives rehearsing our arguments, refining our projects, and constructing our mental models. We tell ourselves stories about who we are and what we are capable of achieving. But the true test of our characterโ€”the raw, unfiltered reality of our competenceโ€”isn’t found in the safety of preparation.

It is revealed in the sudden shock of execution.

Thompsonโ€™s observation about sports is ultimately an observation about the human condition. We aren’t all athletes waiting in the tunnel, shifting our weight from foot to foot, but we all face our own versions of the stadium lights.

I think about the seasons in my own life when the lights suddenly flared. The unexpected crisis that derailed months of careful planning. A sudden pivot required in a business strategy. A moment demanding moral courage when it would have been infinitely easier to remain quietly in the background. In some of those moments, I stepped up, grounded by the quiet work I had done in the dark. In othersโ€”and I admit this with a winceโ€”I blinked against the glare, my confidence suddenly outpacing my competence.

That is the terrifying, beautiful geometry of choices. When the lights hit, the gap between who we claim to be and who we actually are is illuminated for everyone to see.

There is a kind of extreme accountability in that moment. It strips away the hedging and the theoretical. You either make the play, or you don’t. You either hold your ground, or you retreat. It is a crucible that burns away the superfluous, leaving only the essential truth of our character.

We cannot control when the switch will be flipped. The world has a habit of throwing us onto the stage precisely when we feel least ready. But we can control how we build ourselves in the dark. We can ensure that our patience isn’t just stubbornness in disguise, and that our confidence is deeply rooted in reality.

The chaos of the sudden glare isn’t an obstacle to the mission; it is the environment in which the mission earns its meaning. The lights will come on. They always do.

The only question that matters is who we will be in the glare.

Categories
Living Norway Sports

The Norwegian Secret: Play Over Pressure

The Winter Olympics arrive, and like clockwork, a nation of just over five million people sits comfortably atop the global medal table. It defies traditional logic. You look at countries with massive populations, vast alpine resources, and infinitely deeper pockets, and yet, Norway outpaces them all. We naturally assume their secret is a spartan, rigorous system. We picture toddlers strapped to skis, enduring grueling regimens under the watchful eye of demanding coaches.

But the truth is far more subversive and, frankly, a little humbling. The Norwegian secret isn’t a hyper-competitive factory of future champions. It’s the radical, almost rebellious act of just letting kids play.

Watching a recent deep-dive into this phenomenon, the contrast is stark. In Norway, youth sports aren’t about building a resume or chasing a polished plastic trophy. In fact, until they reach their early teens, Norwegian kids don’t experience the manufactured pressure of scoreboards, rankings, or regional championships. The mandate is incredibly simple: do what you want, for as long as you want, as long as it remains interesting to you.

This runs entirely counter to the culture of early specialization and relentless achievement we are so accustomed to in the rest of the world. We are often told that if a child hasn’t picked their lane by age sevenโ€”if they aren’t on the elite travel team, practicing six days a weekโ€”they are already falling irrevocably behind. We apply the anxieties of adulthood to the playgrounds of childhood. We emphasize the grind, convinced that pressure is the only thing that creates diamonds.

Yet, the Norwegian model suggests that early pressure might just crush the joy right out of the endeavor. The athletes who eventually stand on the Olympic podium often share a surprisingly casual origin story. They didn’t burn out by age twelve because they were never forced to specialize.

“Yeah, I was a slalom skier until I was 14, and then I got bored and switched to the biathlon.”

The cross-training happened naturally. The athleticism was built not through forced repetition, but through sheer, unadulterated exploration. Because there was no pressure, they developed a deep, intrinsic love for the snow, the ice, and the movement itself.

There is a profound philosophical lesson here that extends far beyond winter sports. Itโ€™s about how we cultivate mastery in any domain of life. When we remove the external validationsโ€”the immediate rankings, the trophies, the fear of losingโ€”we create space for genuine, intrinsic motivation to take root. We allow curiosity to be the engine of growth.

Think about our own careers, our hobbies, and our personal development. How often do we abandon something we might have eventually loved because we weren’t immediately “winning” at it? How much deeper could our skills run if we allowed ourselves the grace to be amateurs, to switch paths when our interests evolved, without feeling like we were falling behind on some imaginary scorecard?

Letting kids play isn’t just a strategy for hoarding gold medals; it’s a blueprint for sustainable success and resilience. It turns out that when the stakes are kept low, the ceiling for human potential is incredibly high. The best way to build a champion, it seems, is to forget about the championship entirely and just enjoy the snow.

Categories
Photography Photography - Canon 5D Mark II Sports Stanford

Equestrians at Stanford Red Barn

Serious - Stanford Horse Show - by Scott Loftesness

Frankly, I’m not much of a sports fan – so I headed over this afternoon – on Super Bowl Sunday – to Stanford looking for some opportunities for HDR photography. It’s been a glorious weekend here in the San Francisco Bay Area – with bright blue skies, temperatures in the 70s, just a delight. Had to get out of the house for an hour or two of photography explorations! One of the blessings of shooting HDR is that mid-day sun and shadows can be your friend.

I had recently met a family who happened to have horses – and they kept them at the Stanford Red Barn. It had been a while since I’ve visited the barn area – so I decided that would be my first stop.

Turns out, there was a collegiate horse show event underway at the Barn – so that provided me an opportunity to try out shooting with my Canon 5D Mark II in modes that I’ve really not tried before. This Flickr set is the result. I was mostly shooting in Aperture Priority using the AI Servo autofocus mode with all focus points enabled. I had the 70-200mm f/2.8L lens wide open at f/2.8.

My favorite image from the shoot is the one above. She’s so serious. Hope she won her event!

I also took some HDR shots using my Canon PowerShot S95 – here’s that set on Flickr. One example below:

Stanford Red Barn - Stanford University by Scott Loftesness

Categories
San Francisco/California Sports

Go Giants!

From Cafe Borrone at lunch today…

Go Giants - Cafe Borrone

Categories
Sports Web/Tech

The Olympics – A Microsoft Experience

In an article titled “Olympics Online, With a Hook” in tomorrow’s New York Times, John Markoff writes about how Microsoft and NBC are offering the Olympics online – as long as you install Microsoft’s Silverlight web browser plug-in to watch it.

Too bad NBC decided to go down this path with its Olympic content this year. Of course, as a new iPhone 3G owner, I’d have much preferred that NBC embraced the proprietary Apple media approach!

Oh well – I suppose I could try to deal with all of this on my virtual Windows XP machine on my Mac – but I really just can’t be bothered.