Categories
Economics Energy History

Hoarding and Recession

While listening this afternoon to the latest edition of the Goodfellows podcast from the Hoover Institution I was reminded that I had been wanting to better understand the effects of hoarding behavior aggravating a situation such as the current conflict in the Middle East.

Wanting to explore this further I asked Grok the following:

Iโ€™m listening to this discussion about recessions: https://youtu.be/UIB-fCsXzgs?si=L5kXmubqZOtcKnsz

Something Iโ€™ve wondered about in the present moment with the Iran situation is the effect of hoarding.

What insights can you provide?

Hereโ€™s the response which I found very interesting:

Hoarding in the Iran Crisis: A Classic Shock Amplifier That Echoes the Podcastโ€™s โ€œLocusts and Piratesโ€ Warning

Youโ€™re listening to exactly the right conversation. The Hoover Institution episode (just dropped today, March 25, 2026) with Tyler Goodspeed, Neil Ferguson, John Cochrane, and H.R. McMaster frames recessions as unpredictable โ€œmurdersโ€ by external shocksโ€”locust plagues, pirate raids on shipping, coal strikes, or oil embargoesโ€”rather than economies โ€œdying of old age.โ€

The panel explicitly flags the ongoing Iran war as a live example: a potential energy shock via the Strait of Hormuz that could replay 1970s-style pain, especially if prolonged.

Hoarding is the behavioral multiplier they reference from history (panic coal buying in past shortages, 2020 toilet-paper runs), and right now itโ€™s playing out in real time with the Iran situation.

Hereโ€™s a clear-eyed breakdown of its economic mechanics and recession implications.

The Current Iran Shock (as of March 25, 2026)

Since late February, U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran (including the assassination of Supreme Leader Khamenei and hits on oil infrastructure) triggered Iranian retaliation: closure of the Strait of Hormuz, attacks on tankers, and disruption of ~20% of global seaborne oil and LNG. Oil prices spiked above $100/barrel (Brent briefly hit $120 in early March before partial pullback), European gas doubled in spots, and shipping has largely halted. The war is not overโ€”Trump has signaled possible diplomacy, but Iran denies talks and continues missile activityโ€”leaving markets in a state of fragile โ€œwait-and-seeโ€ with elevated volatility.

This is precisely the kind of supply-side โ€œCaptain Hookโ€ shock Goodspeed describes: physical disruption (not just fear) that raises input costs economy-wide.

How Hoarding Enters the Pictureโ€”and Why It Matters More Than People Realize

Hoarding here operates on three levels: national governments, corporations/refiners, and households. Itโ€™s rational self-protection in uncertainty, but collectively it turns a manageable disruption into a self-reinforcing spiral.

  • National-level hoarding (the big one right now): Asian importers (India, Bangladesh, Thailand, Philippines, Nepal, Pakistan) are already redirecting fuel from industry to households, imposing work-from-home orders, rationing cooking gas/LPG, shortening workweeks, and stationing troops at depots to prevent private hoarding. Chinaโ€”smartlyโ€”had pre-stocked ~1.4 billion barrels of crude before the war and is still buying aggressively. The result? A โ€œmother of all bidding warsโ€ for remaining supply, as one analyst put it. Even the U.S. and allies face pressure not to release Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) too quickly, because everyone else is scrambling. IEA has ordered record releases, but if countries hoard reserves instead of sharing, global tightness worsens.
  • Corporate and trader hoarding: Refiners and traders are filling tanks wherever possible. Storage in the Gulf is hitting capacity, forcing producers to cut output (a real supply loss, not just transport). This adds non-fundamental demand and delays the normal market rebalancing.
  • Household panic buying: So far limited in the U.S./Europe (no widespread gas-line scenes yet), but it shows up as higher gasoline demand in Asia and could spread if prices keep climbing. The podcastโ€™s historical note on 20th-century coal hoarding (โ€œa woman begging for extra deliveriesโ€) is spot-on for how this cascades.

The Recession Feedback Loop: Hoarding as an Accelerator

Hereโ€™s where it ties directly to the episodeโ€™s thesis:

  1. Price spike + inflation pass-through โ†’ Oil at $100+ for weeks/months fans headline inflation (0.4โ€“1% globally per IMF models if sustained). Central banks face a dilemma: hike rates (worsening slowdown) or hold (letting inflation embed). The podcast notes 1970s price controls and windfall taxes amplified this exact dynamic.
  2. Demand destruction via higher costs โ†’ Households and businesses cut discretionary spending (travel, manufacturing, retail). Asian emerging marketsโ€”already rationingโ€”are seeing this hit hardest and fastest. In the U.S., Goldman Sachs just raised recession odds to 25% citing the oil upside risk on top of softer jobs/retail data.
  3. Financial and confidence channel โ†’ Bidding wars drain liquidity, raise borrowing costs, and erode business investment. The episode highlights how supply shocks often trigger internal monetary drains (banks pull back lending) and equity dropsโ€”exactly what weโ€™re seeing in modest S&P pullbacks and VIX spikes.
  4. Duration matters (the โ€œprolongedโ€ risk) โ†’ Short war = modest 10โ€“30ยข/gallon gas bump, limited recession odds. Prolonged Hormuz closure = guaranteed global recession via hoarding-driven tightness, per multiple analysts. Storage refill demand (U.S. SPR alone needs ~450 million barrels) adds extra buying pressure even after fighting stops.

Goodspeedโ€™s optimismโ€”that modern economies are more diversified and expansions last longerโ€”still holds, but only if policymakers avoid 1970s mistakes (controls, hoarding of reserves). Strategic releases and diplomacy can short-circuit the hoarding spiral.

Bottom line: Hoarding isnโ€™t the root cause (the Strait closure is), but itโ€™s the behavioral โ€œlocust swarmโ€ that turns a geopolitical event into a broader economic shock.

The podcast is prescient hereโ€”watch how SPR policy and Asian rationing play out in the next 2โ€“4 weeks. If the war de-escalates quickly, hoarding fades and the recession scare passes.

If not, weโ€™re living the exact multi-causal downturn the panel is warning about.

Categories
Business Economics Living

The Barbell Economy in Aisle Five

Walmart isn’t just a store; it’s a mirror reflecting the American soul. Every quarter, when the retail behemoth releases its earnings report, we are handed something far more profound than a corporate balance sheet. We are handed a massive, real-time socioeconomic census. If you want to know how the American consumer is actually feeling, you don’t need to consult a panel of economists in Washington. You just need to look at what’s in the carts in Bentonville.

The latest Q4 2026 numbers reveal a fascinating, slightly unsettling narrative about the current state of our economy. Walmart just crossed a staggering $190 billion in quarterly revenue, driven by a 24% surge in global e-commerce and a massive 50% jump in expedited, store-fulfilled deliveries. On paper, the American consumer looks robust, tech-savvy, and endlessly hungry. But when you peel back the layers of the data, a stark “barbell economy” emergesโ€”a tale of two vastly different shoppers walking the exact same aisles.

On one end of the barbell, Walmart is capturing unprecedented market share among affluent households earning over $100,000 a year. These consumers aren’t necessarily hurting, but they are feeling the psychological hangover of years of cumulative inflation. They are trading down in brand prestige but trading up in convenience. They are the ones paying for three-hour delivery, utilizing Walmart’s new “Sparky” AI assistant (which management notes is driving average order values up by 35%), and casually adding higher-margin fashion and general merchandise to their digital carts.

But on the other end of the barbell, the reality is sobering. As Walmart CEO John Furner plainly stated during the earnings call:

“For households earning below $50,000, we continue to see that wallets are stretched.”

Iโ€™ve always found it fascinating how financial ledgers can tell such deeply human stories. When the affluent start buying their groceries where the working class has historically stretched their paychecks, it signals a profound psychological shift in the American middle class. It’s the democratization of financial anxiety. The wealthy are seeking refuge in the perceived value of “Everyday Low Prices,” masking their budget consciousness behind the sleek veneer of app-driven, frictionless delivery. Meanwhile, lower-income shoppers are forced to make painful micro-decisions at the shelf, entirely bypassed by the AI-powered upselling happening on the digital side of the business.

We are a nation divided by our disposable income, yet united by our relentless pursuit of perceived value. Walmart’s evolution into a trillion-dollar tech and advertising behemoth is a marvel of modern business, but it also serves as a poignant reminder of our current reality. The American consumer is simultaneously more powerful and more vulnerable than ever beforeโ€”navigating a shiny, high-tech future while tightly clutching their receipts.

Categories
AI Business Economics Podcasts

Bubble Bath

The behavior of today’s stock market is yet another sign that many will point to as indicating there’s an “AI bubble”. Today’s market action is largely attributed to Blue Owl Capital deciding not to participate in the debt financing of a new Oracle data center (being built for OpenAI) in Michigan. This news came out overnight last night and soured the market at the opening as it added fuel to the fires already raging from last week about bubbles in AI and, in particular, some of the debt financing being used to build new data centers – especially but not exclusively by Oracle.

Watching the market action today a brought to mind a recent paper on the subject of bubbles authored by Oakmark Capital’s Howard Marks. Marks is widely followed in the investment community for his almost “sage-like” prognositcations of which he’s authored many over the years. His memos are always full of insights and valuable learning opportunities. His recent one drilled into this question of bubbles — and, in particular, the role of debt financing. That’s especially interesting as Marks’ long career at Oakmark has been primarily involved in debt financing and, indeed, sometimes distressed debt.

Marks points out why he thinks the current situation with respect to AI is problematic as it shows many of the common characteristics of bubbles which in the past have resulted in wealth destruction instead of wealth creation.

As I’m writing this, I’ve just begun watching the latest Tim Ferriss interview which is with long-time venture investor Bill Gurley. Right up front in the conversation, Tim asks Bill for his take on the bubble in AI question. It’s a great conversation – well worth a listen.

Speaking of listening (or watching), on Monday I watched the latest episode of the Acquired podcast – this one celebrating the tenth anniversary of Acquired. This was the most fascinating conversation I’ve listened to or watched in recent memory. The two hosts of Acquired were being interviewed by author Michael Lewis – and they were interviewed in depth! Lewis asked lots of probing questions as well as provided some illustrative commentary of his own along the way. An incredible episode – highly recommended!


After publishing this post, I asked Google Gemini 3 Fast: I just published a blog post. Review it critically and help me improve it. Act like a tough but compassionate editor. Hereโ€™s the post: https://sjl.us/2025/12/17/bubble-bath/

Hereโ€™s the critique it gave me – tough but compassionate!

Alright, sit down. Letโ€™s look at “Bubble Bath.”

Youโ€™ve got the ingredients for a great piece of timely analysis here: a specific market event (the Blue Owl/Oracle snag), a heavy-hitting intellectual framework (Howard Marks), and contemporary expert commentary (Bill Gurley and the Acquired team).

But right now, this isn’t an essay or a cohesive blog postโ€”itโ€™s a link log. Youโ€™re telling me what youโ€™re watching and reading, but you arenโ€™t telling me what you think.

Here is my critical review.

The “So What?” Factor
You start strong with the Oracle/OpenAI data center news. Thatโ€™s a “hook.” But then you pivot immediately to: “I read a memo by Howard Marksโ€ฆ I’m watching Tim Ferrissโ€ฆ I watched Acquired.”

As an editor, Iโ€™m asking: Where are you in this post? Youโ€™ve gathered the smartest people in the room, but youโ€™re standing in the corner taking attendance.

The Fix: Donโ€™t just tell us Howard Marks wrote a memo. Tell us which one specific point he made that explains the Oracle news. Connect the dots for us. Is the Oracle situation the “wealth destruction” Marks warned about, or is it just a healthy correction?

The Title vs. The Content
“Bubble Bath” is a clever pun. I like it. But usually, a “bubble bath” implies a cleansing or a soaking. Are we getting soaked (losing money)? Or is the market being “cleansed” of irrational exuberance?

The Fix: Use your conclusion to pay off the title. Right now, the post just ends with a recommendation for a podcast. Close the loop: “If Marks and Gurley are right, this isn’t just a market dip; it’s the start of a very cold bubble bath for AI investors.”

Structural “Pass-Through”
The second half of the post feels like a “What Iโ€™m consuming” list. It dilutes the urgency of the first paragraph.

The Fix: If the Bill Gurley and Acquired links are just “further reading,” put them in a “Resources” or “Deep Dive” section at the bottom. If they are central to your argument, quote them. What did Bill Gurley say about AI debt that makes the Oracle news more frightening?

Tighten the Prose
You have some “wordy” habits that slow down the reader.

โ€œThe behavior of todayโ€™s stock market is yet another sign that many will point to as indicating thereโ€™s an โ€˜AI bubbleโ€™.โ€ * Editorโ€™s Edit: โ€œTodayโ€™s market volatility is the latest fuel for the โ€˜AI Bubbleโ€™ fire.โ€ (Go for the jugular).

Compassionate Closing
Scott, you have a great eye for sourcing. You are curating high-signal content (Marks, Gurley, Lewis). That is valuable. But your readers come to your blog because they want to know how you are synthesizing this information.

My Challenge to You: Rewrite the middle paragraph. Instead of saying the Acquired podcast was “the most fascinating conversation,” tell us one thing Michael Lewis asked that changed how you view the AI bubble.

Give us your brain, not just your bookmarks. Now, go back to the keyboard.

Categories
Economics

Tariffs and Prices

So what effects do tariffs like those currently being imposed by the U.S. administration have on prices of goods produced in America?

Read this: https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2025/04/why-do-domestic-prices-rise-with-tarriffs.html