Categories
Science

The Whiteness of the Lather

โ€œConsider a bar of soap. Has it ever struck you that soap lather is always white no matter what color the soap is? That isnโ€™t because the soap somehow changes color when it is moistened and rubbed. Molecularly, itโ€™s exactly as it was before. Itโ€™s just that the foam reflects light in a different way. You get the same effect with crashing waves on a beachโ€”greeny-blue water, white foamโ€”and lots of other phenomena. That is because color isnโ€™t a fixed reality but a perception.โ€ (Bill Bryson, The Body)

I have been thinking about soap. Not the smell of it, not the brand, not the dish it sits in by the sink, but its color, and what becomes of that color the moment the soap is wet and worked between the hands. However dark the bar the foam that comes off it is white. It is always white.

The soap has not changed. This is the part that unsettles me a little, still, though I understand the physics of it well enough to explain it to a child. Nothing has been dissolved out of the soap, no pigment washed down the drain with the first rinse. The bar, examined afterward, is exactly what it was โ€” same weight, same tint, same faint milled scent. What has changed is only the shape of the surface presented to the light. A solid surface reflects color; a foam of small bubbles scatters light in every direction at once, and the scattering reads, to the eye, as white. The water does this too, at the shoreline, where the sea that looked green or the color of a bruise all the way to the horizon turns to white foam the instant it breaks against the sand. Nothing in the ocean has been added or subtracted. Only its surface has been shattered into a million small mirrors, and a million small mirrors, taken together, show us nothing but the light itself.

There is a machine built on the same principle, aimed at the opposite end. A stealth aircraft is not invisible in the way a child means invisible โ€” it has not been made transparent, or absent, or small. It has been shaped. Every facet of the old F-117, every curved plate of the B-2, is angled to take an incoming radar signal and send it away, off at some oblique angle, into empty sky, anywhere but back to the dish that sent it out looking. Where the geometry alone cannot manage it, a coating finishes the job, converting the beam into a small, undetectable warmth rather than an echo. The aircraft has not changed what it is. It has changed only where its reflection goes. The operator at the radar screen sees nothing, and concludes, wrongly, that there is nothing there.

The foam and the aircraft are the same trick, pointed in opposite directions. Both break a surface’s geometry until the return signal โ€” light, in one case, radar, in the other โ€” stops describing the object honestly. The foam scatters light everywhere at once and reads, to the eye, as brilliant and total. The aircraft scatters radar everywhere except back to the observer and reads, to the screen, as nothing at all. One hides by flooding the return. The other hides by starving it. Neither the soap nor the aircraft has changed what it is. What has changed is the transaction between the object and whatever signal goes out to find it โ€” and it is that transaction, not the object, that a color or a presence turns out to describe.

I do not think this makes color, or presence, less real. I think it makes real a smaller and stranger category than we had assumed. We want our perceptions to be reports from the world, filed accurately, awaiting only our attention. It is more honest, and harder to sit with, to admit that a great many of our perceptions are not reports at all but events โ€” things that happen at the meeting point of a self and a surface, and that would not happen in quite the same way to anyone standing an inch to the left.

I rinse the soap and set it back in the dish. In a moment the foam is gone, down through the drain, and the bar is only itself again, the color it always was, waiting for the next hand to come along and change it into something briefly, purely white.

Categories
Technology

The Silence of Glass

There is a moment, right before surgery, when the anesthesiologist asks you to count backward from ten. You get to seven, maybe six, and then the world goes clean and white. Scientists have a word for the material responsible for that transition: borosilicate. The same compound in the syringe barrel is in the telescope mirror trained on the Andromeda galaxy, in the fiber strand carrying the surgeonโ€™s consultation with a colleague three thousand miles away, in the smartphone screen the patientโ€™s wife is staring at in the waiting room, hands shaking, refreshing nothing.

Glass is everywhere and we have made it invisible, which is the oldest trick civilization knows.


Vaclav Smil argues in Making the Modern World that the most consequential material of the last two centuries is not steel or silicon or oil. It is float glass โ€” invented by Alastair Pilkington in 1959, when he watched dishwater spread across his kitchen sink and understood something that had eluded glassmakers for four hundred years. Pour molten glass onto a bath of molten tin and it finds its own level. It becomes, on its own, perfectly flat. Every window, phone screen, solar panel, and architectural facade descends from a man watching his wife do dishes.

What Smil doesnโ€™t quite say โ€” though you feel it accumulating across his pages โ€” is that glass is the one material that consistently mediates between the inner and the outer. Not metaphorically. Literally. It stands at the boundary and says: you may look, but you may not touch.


The fiber optic cable looks like nothing. Pull back the orange jacket and you find strands thinner than a human hair, each one pure silica glass so precisely drawn that a photon launched into one end will emerge after sixty miles having lost less than five percent of its energy. That number seems impossible. It is a kind of miracle achieved through obsessive purity: any contaminant at the molecular level, any stress in the crystal lattice, any deviation in the core diameter, and the light scatters and dies. Underneath every ocean, through every mountain, connecting data centers in Virginia to servers in Singapore, there are hundreds of millions of kilometers of this material, laid in darkness, carrying light.

I think about that sometimes when I hit send. The electrons leave my keyboard, convert to photons at some local junction, and then travel โ€” genuinely travel, as light through glass โ€” to wherever they are going. There is something devotional about it, though I canโ€™t quite say why. Maybe itโ€™s the invisibility. Maybe itโ€™s the faith required โ€” that the thing you release will arrive, intact, somewhere it has never been.


Glass is in the MRI machine and the X-ray plate and the laboratory flask where the drug was first synthesized and the vial where it is stored and the syringe through which it enters the body. Glass does not react. It does not corrode. It does not leach. This chemical inertness, which seems like absence, is actually the whole point. Medicine needed a container that would hold the thing without becoming it.

There is also glass in the eye reading the label on that vial. The human lens is, optically speaking, a soft glass. It focuses, ages, clouds โ€” cataracts are the eyeโ€™s glass going milky โ€” and the surgeon replaces it with an intraocular lens engineered to behave like glass. We have spent considerable effort making fake versions of something the body was already doing.


For most of human history, clear glass was expensive, fragile, and small. Window glass in medieval Europe admitted light hazily, like looking through ice. Clear vision was for churches, which is perhaps why we came to associate light with the sacred โ€” it literally arrived, in those buildings, in a way it did not arrive anywhere else. Then Pilkingtonโ€™s tin bath made clarity cheap, and the world changed in ways nobody fully catalogued because the change was so pervasive: big windows, watched experiments, extended growing seasons, telescopes reaching farther, microscopes going smaller. Each a story of glass making a distance crossable that was not crossable before.


The screen I am writing this on is glass. The Corning Gorilla Glass on this display is an alkali-aluminosilicate sheet, chemically strengthened through ion exchange, harder than most knives, clear enough that the pixels look like they are sitting on the surface rather than behind it. Apple spends considerable engineering effort making the glass seem like it isnโ€™t there. The ideal phone screen is invisible. A window to computation.

And yet the glass is the thing you actually touch. All day. More than you touch almost anyone. The glass is warm from your hands. It has learned, in a way, the pressure of your thumbs.


Glass is the material of thresholds โ€” it makes the threshold visible, makes it possible to stand at a door and see all the way through before you decide whether to enter. We built the internet through it. We see our loved ones through it. We study cancer through it. We watch the news through glass that traveled to us through glass captured by cameras with glass sensors launched on satellites with glass lenses through a sky that is itself, technically, a lens โ€” bending and filtering the light from everything that has ever been.


In the hospital waiting room, the wife is still holding her phone. The screen has gone dark. She taps it. It lights up. She looks at her own reflection for a moment โ€” the screen a mirror now โ€” before the notification arrives and the glass goes transparent again, the way it always does, showing her something other than herself.

That is what glass does. It waits. It holds. And then, when there is something to show, it gets out of the way.