Lightroom Photography

Lightroom vs Other Post-Processing Software for Photos is running a poll asking what post-processing software photographers are using. So far, based on only 40 votes, Lightroom is garnering 68% of the votes – clearly the leader. #2 is Photoshop with 23%.

2 replies on “Lightroom vs Other Post-Processing Software for Photos”

I have Lightroom 2 and Photoshop CS3, but Adobe’s creeping bloat has turned me off Photoshop, and I have no plans to “upgrade” to CS4 (nor do many other users, as Adobe’s dismal sales of CS4 show). It doesn’t help that Lightroom is 64-bit on my Mac when Photoshop isn’t, despite being the new kid on the block.
The fact Lightroom is written in a modern interpreted language (Lua) rather than C++ is what gives the Lightroom team its agility and ability to deploy new features much faster then the teams stuck in the past with legacy languages and frameworks.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.